For a home computer there really is no difference. There are a lot of technical improvement with UEFI as well as security to prevent booting of unknown kernels or even unknown bootloaders (Secure Boot), but this is again something which is kind of pointless for a home computer in my opinion.
I just remembered that there is one advantage that home users might have benefit of, if you care about that sort of thing: UEFI booting can use the GPU very early in the boot process, which allows for fancy high resolution logos to display during boot.
The advantages are (ripped directly from the Wikipedia article:
Ability to boot from large disks (over 2 TB) with a GUID Partition Table (GPT)
CPU-independent architecture
CPU-independent drivers
Flexible pre-OS environment, including network capability
Modular design
Backward and forward compatibility
Most of this is something I suspect most home users don't really care about. Besides, after your system has booted, there is no difference. It's just the actual boot process that is different.
EDIT: Accidentally clicked on "Post reply" while editing formatting....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.