Well well, it should be entertaining watching fat old Intel puffing around the track trying to catch up.
But I won't be to surprised if they aren't holding something back to meet this contingency...
If not expect a shake up in Intel's management I mean all things considered this should have never happened....
Well done great to see you fight your way out of the corner AMD
Elephants look slow and lazy...until they start their run.
Not one of Intel' holes leaks or other missteps have ever affected me personally.
So I leave complaints to those who have been affected.
Intel gave me a 4.8 chip for the price of a 3.4 chip.
So I don't get to unhappy about reported chip errors that don't affect me.
How about others?
Has anyone here been personally affected by an Intel goof?
Or an AMD goof for that matter?
I just have to ask you then, why do we care? Is it really a flaw if it doesn't effect us?
Sure I like perfect in theory, but I've never even seen a perfect theory. ":O}
I just have to ask you then, why do we care? Is it really a flaw if it doesn't effect us?
Sure I like perfect in theory, but I've never even seen a perfect theory. ":O}
Intel gave me a 4.8 chip for the price of a 3.4 chip.
'Cause Intel is a monster of a company that has a cavalier attitude toward it users. If it doesn't bother you that's fine.
But I won't be to surprised if they aren't holding something back to meet this contingency...
If not expect a shake up in Intel's management I mean all things considered this should have never happened....
Intel haven't got anything generally competitive with AMD for the next couple of years. They are quietly admitting that themselves. Publicly they put on a brave face and talk about 'real world benchmarks' and 'synergies with partners', but privately they're in a deep hole and they know it.
HOWEVER, the people saying that Intel are 'down for the count' are complete and utter idiots. Intel STILL is not able to meet demand for their chips. All AMD really is doing is picking up the portion of the market that Intel hasn't been able to service, and nibbling a bit at Intel's market share. Intel are FAR from being seriously wounded.
Consider this: Intel spends right at the same amount for R&D as AMD receives in GROSS REVENUE!
That's right, Intel's R&D budget ALONE is equivalent to every cent that AMD generates in income (not just AMD's profit, but total income).
Intel have been stung, but they have the resources to throw at solving the problem, and anyone who doesn't think they will is IMO a moron.
The real question here is whether AMD will be able to continue to innovate and keep Intel at bay. Lisa Su has done a truly remarkable job getting AMD focused and competitive, but they are still far from being safe.
Should not they be punished as well? imho, of course.
Which is why I said I felt heads should roll at Intel corp.How did they let this happen??
Not just a CPU. You will need a new mother board, RAM and Video card. (are Intel and AMD Rams interchangeable?) Switching can add to your costs. But I usually only get one chip per motherboard before my MB is obsolete.So perhaps not by much...and probably still cheaper that staying with Intel.I noticed that AMD is offering the most CPU performance by far for far less money. I will personally "vote for them" by buying my next CPU from them. More than enough said.